Recent planning applications

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is ECDC-building-small-300x182.jpg

The following planning applications in the Sutton division have been published by East Cambridgeshire District Council.

20/00739/FUL
Coveney
26 Main Street Coveney CB6 2DJ
Demolition of the existing pair of semi-detached cottages, associated farm and outbuildings, and the erection of five dwellings.

20/00800/FUL
Little Downham
California House California Little Downham
Proposed construction of a detached family dwelling and associated works, in conjunction with previously approved application 19/01512/OUT.

Further information can be found on the district council’s planning pages. If you would like to respond formally to the council about any planning application, comments should be addressed to the district council and not to me.  Comments may be made

  • online using the council’s public access web page (the link above);
  • by email to plservices@eastcambs.gov.uk;
  • or by post to the Planning Department, The Grange, Nutholt Lane, Ely, CB7 4EE.

Better COVID data on the way at last

Very pleased indeed to hear today that Public Health England is finally changing the way it presents COVID-19 data, to include Pillar 2 (community and home testing) as well as Pillar 1 (laboratory testing) results.

Since the start of testing, 1277 cases of COVID-19 have been identified in Cambridgeshire through Pillar 1 testing, and 901 through Pillar 2.

This is very different to the situation widely reported in Leicester, where Pillar 2 tests identified nine times as many cases as Pillar 1.

Whatever the Government is telling us we can now do, we really do still need to do whatever we can to reduce the chance of spreading the virus and continue to observe social distancing and hand hygiene.

I certainly won’t be going to the pub, or for a haircut, for quite a long time yet.

Meanwhile, anyone with COVID symptoms should book a test on the www.NHS/coronavirus website (or call 119 if they don’t have access to the internet). 

Council play areas to reopen on Saturday

Bear, Teddy, Teddy Bear, Toys, Plush, Children Toys

East Cambridgeshire District Council will be re-opening its outdoor play areas on Saturday 4 July.

East Cambridgeshire District Council maintains 19 play areas throughout the district and provides a range of facilities for a variety of ages from toddlers, to juniors and youths. A list of the play areas to be reopened is below.

Further to a conversation with Mark Inskip as Chair of Sutton Parish Council I have asked district council officers for details of their risk assessments, as a number of parish councils have reservations about how they can safely open their play areas and ensure national guidance is met.

Safety guidance

  • Do not use the play equipment if you are showing any symptoms of COVID-19
  • Sanitise hands before and after use (where washing facilities are not available please use hand sanitiser gel)
  • Avoid touching your face
  • Facemasks are recommended where possible
  • Children should be supervised to maintain good hygiene and social distancing
  • If social distancing cannot be maintained, please wait until the equipment is free
  • Please do not consume food or drink while using the play equipment

Council play areas

  • Beresford Road, Ely
  • Brooke Grove, Ely
  • Collier Close, Ely
  • Goldsmith Court, Ely
  • Jubilee Gardens, Ely
  • Kingsley Walk, Ely
  • Morley Drive Toddler Play Area, Ely
  • Murfitt Close, Ely
  • Pocket Park, Ely
  • Tennyson Place, Ely
  • Fisher Bank, Littleport
  • Sandys Crescent, Littleport
  • Meadow Way, Mepal
  • Bittern Grove, Soham
  • Downfields, Soham
  • Kingfisher Drive, Soham
  • Lapwing Way, Soham
  • Teal Avenue, Soham
  • Victoria Green, Witchford

Other play areas within the district not listed above could be the responsibility of the parish council or another organisation.

For more information about play areas in East Cambridgeshire visit https://www.eastcambs.gov.uk/community/east-cambridgeshire-play-areas

A rant about Openreach

I very rarely get cross. Even when the bureaucracy is being particularly intractable, or opposing politicians particularly objectionable, I can usually rustle up a smile or at worst a resigned shrug.

But there is an exception – and it’s Openreach.

Ten days ago I spent forty minutes on the phone to Beverley at Openreach HQ, most of them on hold. It was the third number for Openreach I’d tried, having plumbed the depths of Google to find it, and I’d gamed the system by selecting options that sounded severe and urgent enough to warrant human attention.

A number of notices had sprung up in Witchford, I’d explained, advising that communications poles were going to be installed by Openreach. The notices advised that this fact was going to be communicated to ‘Ely Council Planning Department’, and that anyone who had a problem with that could write to a postal address in Liverpool.

The correct planning authority, East Cambridgeshire District Council, had not in fact been notified, as is Openreach’s obligation in law. Nor was Openreach responding to East Cambridgeshire District Council’s enquiries on the matter. Indeed, Openreach had reportedly been telling residents with concerns about the installations that it was the duty of their parish council to consult the public on the proposals. This would have been a little difficult, firstly because the parish council had not been notified about the installations either, and secondly because it has no responsibility for telecommunications infrastructure.

The forty minutes on hold proved fruitless, as Beverley could find no-one with the remotest inkling what might be going on in Witchford. Beverley was very sorry, but the only way to address the matter, at the end of the second decade of the twenty-first century, was indeed to write a letter, put a stamp on it, find a postbox, and send it on its way to an address in Liverpool off the road to Bootle. I suspect company procedure hasn’t changed much since the days of writing to say that the post-chaise had been held up by highwaymen.

And it was even worse, explained Beverley, because at the moment due to COVID-19 all the post was having to be gathered up, opened, scanned, and then sent to someone’s home to be answered.

There was, however, thought Beverley, a ray of hope. It may be that the poles were something to do with their Community Fibre team, who were so far sighted and visionary that they had gone out on a limb and procured themselves an email address. It was unlikely, I thought, but worth a punt, so an email message was fired off in their general direction ten days ago.

Today, the email was opened, and the inevitable reply came back. No, it’s nothing to do with us, but if you want to you can put all your concerns on a piece of paper, put it in an envelope, stick the appropriate stamp on it, find a postbox, and send it with thoughts and prayers to the sixth floor of the building off the Bootle road.

Frankly, it is outrageous that a company the size of Openreach, which is responsible for such a significant part of the nation’s vital infrastructure, should be so completely dismissive of the public as to refuse to allow people reasonable means of communication; and that it should be so dismissive of the local authorities whom it is supposed to inform of proposed installations that it doesn’t inform them, fails to answer planning officers’ communications, dumps the resulting community unrest on the public authorities, and simply regards itself as above any form of engagement with anyone except presumably its shareholders.

In the days when I thought I might be quite interested in being a Member of Parliament, I used to wonder if elected what my first entry would be in the ballot for introducing new laws through Private Members’ Bills. That ship has sailed, but I am in no doubt now what my Private Members’ Bill would be. It would make it absolutely illegal, on pain of eye-watering fines followed by public ritual disembowelment for the Chairman and the Chief Finance Officer, for any company responsible for the provision of any aspect of the nation’s infrastructure to hide away from the public behind a postal address, and fail to provide a working telephone number and customer email address and sufficient staff to answer both of them promptly.

Looking at you, Openreach.

Recent planning applications

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is ECDC-building-small-300x182.jpg

The following planning applications in the Sutton division have been published by East Cambridgeshire District Council.

20/00743/OUT
Little Downham
Land adjacent Mount Pleasant Farm 66 Main Street Pymoor CB6 2DY
Outline application for four marketable residential properties (resubmission of 16/00133/OUT).

20/00745/FUL
Little Downham
5 Third Drove Little Downham CB6 2UE
Construction of replacement dwelling and garage.

20/00778/AGN
Little Downham
Poplar Farm 2 Fourth Drove Little Downham
Construction of a new cattle building.

20/00772/FUL
Sutton
21 Stirling Way Sutton CB6 2QY
Proposed combined single and double storey rear extension.

Additionally, though not in the Sutton division, residents may be interested to note the application 20/00730/FUM by the district council’s Trading Company, for 13 dwellings and associated parking and landscaping on the site of the disused swimming pool in Newnham Street Ely CB7 4PQ.

Further information can be found on the district council’s planning pages. If you would like to respond formally to the council about any planning application, comments should be addressed to the district council and not to me.  Comments may be made

  • online using the council’s public access web page (the link above);
  • by email to plservices@eastcambs.gov.uk;
  • or by post to the Planning Department, The Grange, Nutholt Lane, Ely, CB7 4EE.

COVID ‘shielding’ to pause from 1 August

The Government has said that people currently shielding will no longer need to shield after Friday 31 July.

Points to remember:

  • Food parcels and prescription collections for ‘shielded’ residents will continue until Friday 31 July.
  • People who are shielding can register for priority shopping at the major supermarkets until 17 July.
  • NHS volunteers will continue to support the shielded group.
  • Up to date information about the Government’s statements on COVID-19 is available at https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus

The shielding programme may resume in future if circumstances change.

Edit (29 June): Cllr Mark Inskip has pointed out that everyone on the shielding list should have received a new letter from the Government last week on the changing arrangements of 6 July and then 1 August.

Small business grant applications close on Tuesday

If you’re a small business in East Cambridgeshire with ongoing fixed property-related costs and weren’t eligible for Small Business Grants Fund or Retail, Hospitality and Leisure Grants Fund, applications for Discretionary Grants close on Tuesday (3 July).

Priority will be given to

  • Small businesses in shared offices or other flexible work spaces which do not have their own business rates assessment. Examples could include units in industrial parks, science parks and incubators.
  • Regular market traders with fixed building costs, such as rent, who do not have their own business rates assessment.
  • Bed & Breakfasts which pay Council Tax instead of business rates.
  • Charity properties in receipt of charitable business rates relief which would otherwise have been eligible for Small Business Rates Relief or Rural Rate Relief.

In order for your business to qualify for the grant, you must provide evidence that you meet ALL of the following criteria:

  • Businesses with relatively high ongoing fixed property related costs
  • Businesses which occupy property, or part of a property, with a rateable value or annual rent or annual mortgage payments below £51,000
  • Businesses which can demonstrate that they have suffered a significant fall in income due to the COVID-19 crisis
  • Business with fewer than 50 employees
  • Businesses that were trading on or before 11 March 2020.

More information about the grant and how to apply is available at https://www.eastcambs.gov.uk/business/local-authority-small-business-discretionary-grant

Performance review

Slimmed-down council committee meetings in the time of COVID mean that a whole set of documents that used to be presented to committee members for discussion are now just sent round by email for information.

The latest batch are the quarterly performance reports for council functions which fall under the remit of the new Environment & Sustainability Committee – and a few of the charts caught my eye.

Local bus passenger journeys originating in the local authority area

A sad story of decline, with over two million fewer journeys a year than in 2013/14. This figure is only updated once a year, in the summer, so the most recent result isn’t in yet, and will presumably be artificially low because of COVID. But here’s the parlous state of public transport in Cambridgeshire, in a single graph. The text supplied with the graph optimistically describes performance as ‘improving’ because of that last uptick of the solid blue line. But it isn’t, is it, really? Even the council admits that this glimmer of hope is probably just something to do with lifting the charge for parking at the park and rides.

Growth in cycling from a 2004/05 average baseline

Wow those columns are growing well! But why has the target (thicker dotted line) not changed for the last four years? Surely, and especially now in the time of COVID with pop-up cycle lanes and so, on, the council needs to be more ambitious than this? And the real step-change happened in 2014 – there’s been no real improvement since then. This is an annual figure again, so it will be interesting to see what the current year performance is when it comes in.

Traffic entering and leaving Cambridge

The scale goes from 200,000 vehicles at the bottom, to 208,000 at the top – and it’s a snapshot of a twelve-hour day on the first Wednesday in October. So that’s a small increase, and an even smaller decrease, and 2,000 more vehicles entering and leaving Cambridge than six years ago. Another annual figure – the 2020 data will be available in November. How much of the positive traffic-reducing effect of lockdown will have dissipated by then? Or will we be in the middle of lockdown #2?

Changes in traffic flows within Cambridge

By way of comparison, this is what lockdown looks like. This measure is the number of vehicles crossing the River Cam bridges within Cambridge in a single twelve-hour day, in May. This shows a a 66 per cent reduction, pretty obviously COVID related. How much of this vehicle traffic will bounce back next year?

Freedom of Information requests answered within 20 days

Ooh, COVID or no COVID that fall-off in performance doesn’t look good. Not surprisingly, reports against this indicator will be made to senior officers fortnightly for the next six months to ensure performance improves.

Marie Curie bereavement support

I’ve been contacted by a local resident in Witchford asking me to help spread the word about the charity Marie Curie’s bereavement support service and campaign for a National Day of reflection after lockdown.

She says:

“Grieving can feel isolating enough without social distancing. Many people bereaved during lockdown have been unable to properly say goodbye to loved ones, comfort or even hug each other. If they can’t get the support they need, they will be more likely to struggle with the long term effects of grief.

To help, Marie Curie offers a free bereavement support service. Anyone who is grieving can access up to six telephone sessions with a matched volunteer by calling 0800 090 2309. Further details as well as online information and support is available here: www.mariecurie.org.uk/help/support/telephone-bereavement-support

National Day of reflection
The Marie Curie charity is running a petition for a National Day of reflection after lockdown is fully lifted, to collectively support those who have lost someone since lockdown began on 23 March. The petition is at www.mariecurie.org.uk/who/day-to-reflect